Short- and long-term experience in pulmonary vein segmental ostial ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation

Pürerfellner, H; Aichinger, J; Martinek, M; Nesser, HJ and Janssen, J (2006) Short- and long-term experience in pulmonary vein segmental ostial ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Indian Pacing and Electrophysiology Journal, 6 (1). pp. 6-16. ISSN 0972-6292

Full text available as:

PDF - Requires Adobe Acrobat Reader or other PDF viewer.
320 Kb

Abstract

Segmental ostial pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is considered a potentially curative therapeutic approach in the treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF). There is only limited data available on the long-term effect of this procedure. Methods: Patients (Pts) underwent a regular clinical follow up visit at 3, 6 and 24 months after PVI. Clinical success was classified as complete (i.e. no arrhythmia recurrences, no antiarrhythmic drug), partial (i.e. no/only few recurrences, on drug) or as a failure (no benefit). The clinical responder rate (CRR) was determined by combining complete and partial success. Results: 117 patients (96 male, 21 female), aged 51±11 years (range 25 to 73) underwent a total of 166 procedures (1.4/patient) in 2-4 pulmonary veins (PV). 115 patients (98%) had AF, 2 patients presented with regular PV atrial tachycardia. ,109/115 patients. exhibited PAF as the primary arrhythmia (versus persistent AF). A total of 113 patients with PVI in the years 2001 to 2003 were evaluated for their CRR after 6 (3) months. A single intervention was carried out in 63 patients (55.8%), two interventions were performed in 45 patients (39.8%) and three interventions in 5 patients (4.4%). The clinical response demonstrated a complete success of 52% (59 patients), a partial success of 26% (29 patients) and a failure rate of 22% (25 patients), leading to a CRR of 78% (88 patients). Ostial PVI in all 4 PVs exhibited a tendency towards higher curative success rates (54% versus 44% in patients with 3 PVs ablated for the 6 month follow up). Long-term clinical outcome was evaluated in 39 patients with an ablation attempt at 3 PVs only (excluding the right inferior PV in our early experience) and a mean clinical follow up of 21±6 months. At this point in time the success rate was 41% (complete, 16 patients) and 21% (partial, 8 patients), respectively, adding up to a CRR of 62% (24 patients). In total, 20 patients (17.1%) had either a single or 2 (3 patients, 2.6%) complications independent of the number of procedures performed with PV stenosis as the leading cause (7.7%). Conclusion: The CRR of patients with medical refractory PAF in our patient cohort is 78% at the 6 month follow up. PV stenosis is the main cause for procedure-related complications. Ablation of all 4 PV exhibits a tendency towards higher complete success rates despite equal CRR. Calculation of the clinical response after a mid- to long-term follow of 21±6 months in those patients with an ostial PVI in only 3 pulmonary veins (sparing the right inferior PV) shows a further reduction to 62%, exclusively caused by a drop in patients with a former partial success. To evaluate the long-term clinical benefit of segmental ostial PVI in comparison with other ablation techniques, more extended follow up periods are mandatory, including a larger study cohort and a detailed description of procedural parameters.

EPrint Type:Article
Uncontrolled Keywords:Atrial Fibrillation; Pulmonary Vein Ablation, Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation
Subjects:Diagnosis > Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures > Diagnostic Techniques, Cardiovascular > Heart Function Tests > Heart Catheterization > Catheter Ablation
Therapeutics > Cautery > Electrocoagulation > Catheter Ablation
Cardiovascular Diseases > Heart Diseases > Arrhythmia > Atrial Fibrillation
-Journal Repositories > Indian Pacing and Electrophysiology Journal
Therapeutics > Catheterization > Heart Catheterization > Catheter Ablation
Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms > Pathologic Processes > Arrhythmia
ID Code:1247
Deposited By:Indian Pacing and Electrophysiology Journal
Deposited On:05 January 2006

Archive Staff Only: edit this record