Mid-term follow-up of patients with Brugada syndrome following a cardioverter defibrillator implantation: a single center experience

Kharazi, A.; Emkanjoo, Z.; Alizadeh, A.; Nikoo, M.H.; Jorat, M.V. and Sadr-Ameli, M.A. (2007) Mid-term follow-up of patients with Brugada syndrome following a cardioverter defibrillator implantation: a single center experience. Indian Pacing and Electrophysiology Journal, 7 (1). pp. 33-39. ISSN 0972-6292

Full text available as:

PDF - Requires Adobe Acrobat Reader or other PDF viewer.
356 Kb


Background: Brugada syndrome is an arrhythmogenic disease characterized by an ECG pattern of ST-segment elevation in the right precordial leads and an increase risk of sudden cardiac death. Risk stratification for the life-threatening arrhythmic events in Brugada syndrome is not yet established. In the present study, we report our experience in patients with Brugada syndrome, following an ICD implantation. Methods and Results: A total of 12 patients (11 men, 1 woman) with a mean age of 46.5±11.8 were studied. At diagnosis, 7 patients had syncope of unknown origin, 2 patients were asymptomatic, 2 patients were survivors of cardiac arrest, and 1 had documented clinical VT requiring direct cardioversion for termination. Age was similar between the symptomatic and asymptomatic patients (46.6±13 vs. 46±2.8, respectively). Two patients reported a family history of sudden cardiac death. In 3 patients, spontaneous coved-type ECG was found at baseline. In 9 patients, a class I antiarrhythmic drug administration unmasked the characteristic type I ECG. In 4 patients (2 symptomatic with syncope at presentation and 2 asymptomatic), who underwent PES, sustained polymorphic VT or VF was induced. VF was induced by single extrastimuli in 2 symptomatic patients (1 from RV apex and 1 from RVOT). In 2 asymptomatic patients, VF was induced by two and triple ventricular extrastimli (1 from RV apex and 1 from RVOT). None of them experienced an event during follow-up. No significant difference was found between symptomatic and asymptomatic patients (p=NS). The mean follow-up period for the entire study population was 27.83±11.25 months. During follow-up, 2 patients (one with prior cardiac arrest and another with syncope) had VF. Both of them had a type I ECG after provocation with a class I antiarrhythmic drug. None of them had undergone programmed ventricular stimulation. Five patients (41.7 %) had inappropriate ICD interventions during follow-up. The cause of inappropriate therapy was sinus tachycardia in 2 patients, AF in 2 patients and T wave oversensing in 1 patient. Conclusions: Knowledge about Brugada syndrome is steadily progressing but there are still unanswered issues dealing with the risk stratification and the management of patients.

EPrint Type:Article
Uncontrolled Keywords:Brugada syndrome; Cardioverter defibrillator; Programmed ventricular stimulation
Subjects:Diagnosis > Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures > Diagnostic Techniques, Cardiovascular > Heart Function Tests > Electrocardiography
-Journal Repositories > Indian Pacing and Electrophysiology Journal
Cardiovascular Diseases > Heart Diseases > Arrhythmia
Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms > Pathologic Processes > Death
Congenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities > Genetic Diseases, Inborn
Equipment and Supplies > Electrodes > Defibrillators
ID Code:2658
Deposited By:Indian Pacing and Electrophysiology Journal
Deposited On:03 March 2008

Archive Staff Only: edit this record