International medical graduate perceptions of health policy: a pilot study

Agrawal, Shantanu (2008) International medical graduate perceptions of health policy: a pilot study. OPUS 12 Scientist, 2 (1). pp. 9-12. ISSN 1940-8633

Full text available as:

PDF (Portable Document Format) - Requires Adobe Acrobat Reader or other PDF viewer.
196 Kb


Introduction: International Medical Graduates (IMGs) have been a significant proportion of the American physician workforce since the 1960s. Nearly one-fourth of practicing physicians today are IMGs, and the total number of IMGs in graduate medical education is increasing. The purpose of this pilot project was to assess IMG perceptions in three major policy areas: (a) IMG impact on U.S. healthcare, (b) IMG impact on countries of origin, (c) bias/discrimination faced by IMGs. Methods: A survey was conducted of IMGs in an Internal Medicine residency program based at a Queens, New York hospital. Results: Surveyed population (n=27) was 41% PGY1, 30% PGY2, 22% PGY3, 7% PGY4. 55% were men, 78% were between 25-35 years old, and 70% had emigrated to the US within the last 10 years. Impact on U.S. Healthcare: 54% supported U.S. policies favoring immigration of IMGs willing to practice in underserved areas. 70% believed that IMGs would provide care in these areas for a longer period than U.S. graduates, due to satisfaction in serving that patient population (57%) and lack of better opportunities (22%). Justifiable reasons to reduce IMG immigration were to avoid a physician surplus (58%), to reduce harms to countries of origin (21%), and to avoid overcrowding residency programs (13%). Impact on Countries of Origin: 80% of the surveyed IMGs do not plan to return to their country of origin. 56% reported that physician emigration is a detriment to their countries of origin; 84% felt no personal obligation to help reduce the negative effects. Two-thirds received loans or subsidies for education from countries of origin. 31% supported policies for required subsidies repayment, 27% for required service after medical school graduation, 25% for more restrictive emigration policies, 19% for required return to the country of origin after residency training, and 12% for monetary compensation beyond subsidies repayment. Bias or Discrimination: Over one-third of respondents felt bias or discrimination in their work environment. 85% felt that medical professional organizations do not adequately address issues specific to IMGs and 77% reported a desire for greater involvement in such organizations. Conclusion: There is growing debate in public policy over the status of IMG migration to the U.S. This pilot study was designed to explore IMG attitudes toward three major policy areas. A larger, multi-institutional study should be considered.

EPrint Type:Article
Uncontrolled Keywords:International Medical Graduate, Health Policy, Pilot Study, Medical Education, Survey, New York, Internal Medicine, Bias, Discrimination
Subjects:Information Science > Data Collection
Health Care Facilities, Manpower, and Services > Health Personnel
Education > Curriculum
-Journal Repositories > OPUS 12 Scientist
Health Care Quality, Access, and Evaluation > Quality of Health Care > Health Care Evaluation Mechanisms > Data Collection
Education > Teaching
Investigative Techniques > Epidemiologic Methods > Data Collection
Health Occupations > Medicine
Education > International Educational Exchange
Education > Education, Professional
Environment and Public Health > Public Health > Epidemiologic Methods > Data Collection
Education > Mentors
Education > Faculty
ID Code:2829
Deposited By:Dr S. Peter Stawicki
Deposited On:29 April 2008

Archive Staff Only: edit this record